Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HENRY v. COLVIN, 5:14-432-RMG. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20160411785 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. 406(b). (Dkt. No. 39). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $12,498.70, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 39-1 at 9). The Defendant has advised the Court that she does not oppose the approval of Plaintiff's
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. No. 39). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $12,498.70, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 39-1 at 9). The Defendant has advised the Court that she does not oppose the approval of Plaintiff's attorney fee under § 406(b), but correctly notes that upon receipt of the fee award under § 406(b), Plaintiff's counsel is obligated to pay to his client the amount previously awarded by the Court under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 40).

The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's motion in light of the standards set forth in Grisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). The Court finds that pursuant to the Grisbrecht standards the proposed fee is reasonable and grants the Plaintiffs motion to approve the fee in the amount of $12,498.70. Upon receipt of this award, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to reimburse to Plaintiff $3,600.00 previously awarded under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 38).

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer