ENNIS v. ASTRUE, CIV-11-626-M. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20120504h21
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 03, 2012
Latest Update: May 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, District Judge. On April 11, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 416(i), 423. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Commissio
Summary: ORDER VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, District Judge. On April 11, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 416(i), 423. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Commission..
More
ORDER
VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, District Judge.
On April 11, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by May 1, 2012. A review of the file reveals no objection has been filed.
Upon de novo review, the Court:
(1) ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation [docket no. 20] issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 11, 2012;
(2) REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner;
(3) REMANDS for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and
(4) ORDERS that judgment issue forthwith in accordance with the provisions of sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
