Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, Judge. AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2014, considering Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 9), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5), and Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 5), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 9) is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. 3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Counts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII are
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, Judge. AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2014, considering Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 9), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5), and Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 5), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 9) is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. 3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Counts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII are D..
More
ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, Judge.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2014, considering Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 9), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5), and Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 5), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 9) is DENIED.
2. Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED.
3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Counts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII are DISMISSED. Counts VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, and XIII are GRANTED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
