NADAF-RAHROV v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, 16-cv-06323-RS. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170330b38
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 27) and plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 34) are both suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearings set for April 20, 2017 and April 6, 2017, respectively, are vacated. Plaintiffs' motion is unopposed and good cause appears to grant it. 1 Defendants' motion is thereby moot, and is denied on that basis. The matter is dismissed. The Clerk
Summary: ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 27) and plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 34) are both suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearings set for April 20, 2017 and April 6, 2017, respectively, are vacated. Plaintiffs' motion is unopposed and good cause appears to grant it. 1 Defendants' motion is thereby moot, and is denied on that basis. The matter is dismissed. The Clerk s..
More
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 27) and plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 34) are both suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearings set for April 20, 2017 and April 6, 2017, respectively, are vacated. Plaintiffs' motion is unopposed and good cause appears to grant it.1 Defendants' motion is thereby moot, and is denied on that basis. The matter is dismissed. The Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. It is unclear, however, why plaintiffs' did not voluntarily dismiss prior to putting defendants to the burden of moving to dismiss.
Source: Leagle
