Carter v. Berryhill, 6:16-cv-02146-JR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20180228g97
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS ORDER JOLIE A. RUSSO , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff , 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $4,021.46 and expenses $5.23 and costs of $8.60, if not subject to any offset allowe
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS ORDER JOLIE A. RUSSO , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff , 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $4,021.46 and expenses $5.23 and costs of $8.60, if not subject to any offset allowed..
More
ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS
ORDER
JOLIE A. RUSSO, Magistrate Judge.
Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $4,021.46 and expenses $5.23 and costs of $8.60, if not subject to any offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program as discussed in Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney's office.
Source: Leagle
