Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Standard Kollsman Industries, Inc. v. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc, 14464_1 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 14464_1 Visitors: 24
Filed: Apr. 13, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 329 F.2d 645 141 U.S.P.Q. 318 STANDARD KOLLSMAN INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. SARKES TARZIAN, INC. No. 14464. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued March 9, 1964. Decided April 13, 1964. Sidney G. Faber, New York City (Jerome M. Berliner, Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, New York City, on the brief), for appellant. M. Hudson Rathburn, Chicago, Ill., (Reginald K. Bailey, Clemens Hufmann, Chicago, Ill., Herbert A. Bernstein, Lesnik & Amoscato, Newark, N.J., Mason, Kolehmainen, Rat
More

329 F.2d 645

141 U.S.P.Q. 318

STANDARD KOLLSMAN INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant,
v.
SARKES TARZIAN, INC.

No. 14464.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 9, 1964.
Decided April 13, 1964.

Sidney G. Faber, New York City (Jerome M. Berliner, Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

M. Hudson Rathburn, Chicago, Ill., (Reginald K. Bailey, Clemens Hufmann, Chicago, Ill., Herbert A. Bernstein, Lesnik & Amoscato, Newark, N.J., Mason, Kolehmainen, Rathburn & Wyss, Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

A careful examination of the record and briefs of the parties and consideration of the oral arguments convince us that the court below committed no error. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed upon the succinct and comprehensive opinion of Judge Wortendyke.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer