Filed: May 07, 2019
Latest Update: May 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 7th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of the Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Request for Review (Document No. 14), the defendant's response, the Plaintiff's Reply Brief, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Document No. 18), the Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 19), and the Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Objections, and after a thorough and
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 7th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of the Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Request for Review (Document No. 14), the defendant's response, the Plaintiff's Reply Brief, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Document No. 18), the Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 19), and the Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Objections, and after a thorough and ..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge.
NOW, this 7th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of the Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Request for Review (Document No. 14), the defendant's response, the Plaintiff's Reply Brief, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Document No. 18), the Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 19), and the Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Objections, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; and
3. The plaintiff's request for review is DENIED.
