Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Leach v. Berryhill, 5:18-cv-00948. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. West Virginia Number: infdco20190618g21 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IRENE C. BERGER , District Judge . By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on May 21, 2018, this action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). On May 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 11) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on May 21, 2018, this action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On May 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 11) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's brief/motion for judgment on the pleadings, grant the Defendant's brief/motion in support of Defendant's decision, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket.

Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by June 10, 2019, but none were filed by either party. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's brief/motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document 9) be DENIED, the Defendant's brief/motion in support of Defendant's decision (Document 10) be GRANTED, the final decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED, and this action be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Tinsley, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer