OPINION & ORDER

[Resolving Doc. 6]

JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge.

In this breach of contract and unjust enrichment case, Defendant Bruce Madden moves to dismiss Plaintiff Motorcars Honda, Inc.'s ("Motorcars") complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).1 For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant Madden's motion.

With his November 4, 2015 motion, Madden says that the agreement for a Semi-Automated Vehicle Servicing System that underlies Plaintiff Motorcars' complaint is between Plaintiff and Defendant TechAid Auto Systems, Inc. ("TechAid"). Defendant Madden is president of TechAid. Defendant Madden says that he signed the contested agreement as TechAid's president but is not a party to the agreement and is therefore not liable for any alleged harm to Plaintiff.

Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant Madden's motion to dismiss within this Court's set time limit.2

Furthermore, this Court agrees that Plaintiff does not make out a claim against Defendant Madden. "It is fundamental contract law that one cannot be liable for a breach of contract unless one is a party to that contract."3 Presidents act as representatives of the company when signing agreements. They are not parties to the agreement unless some language in the agreement shows an intent for the president to also be a party.4 In this case, the agreement does not indicate that Defendant Madden is a party to the contract. Plaintiff makes no showing that corporate veil piercing or any other method of attaching individual liability to Defendant Madden applies. Therefore, this Court cannot give Plaintiff the relief it seeks from Defendant Madden in its complaint.

The Court GRANTS Defendant Madden's motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.