Munoz v. Armstrong Flooring, Inc., 18-1209. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190607b01
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2019, after reviewing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 25), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 26), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 25) is DENIED IN PART as Plaintiff exhausted her remedies under both Title VII and PHRA, and pleaded a plausibl
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2019, after reviewing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 25), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 26), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 25) is DENIED IN PART as Plaintiff exhausted her remedies under both Title VII and PHRA, and pleaded a plausible..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2019, after reviewing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 25), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 26), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 25) is DENIED IN PART as Plaintiff exhausted her remedies under both Title VII and PHRA, and pleaded a plausible right to relief for all causes of action and punitive damages.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No 25) is GRANTED IN PART for Counts II and III against Ms. Boas as individuals cannot be held personally liable for violations under Title VII. Counts II and III against Ms. Boas will be dismissed.
3. All other claims will remain as pleaded.
Source: Leagle
