MCCAFFREY v. WINDSOR AT WINDERMERE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 17-460. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20171116f63
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, it is ORDERED that, consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law: 1. Defendant Windsor Property Management Company's (WPMC's) motion to strike plaintiff Stepfanie McCaffrey's new brief in opposition to WPMC's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 43, is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE the brief plaintiff filed at docket number 41-1; 2. WPMC's motion to renew its reply in support of its motion
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, it is ORDERED that, consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law: 1. Defendant Windsor Property Management Company's (WPMC's) motion to strike plaintiff Stepfanie McCaffrey's new brief in opposition to WPMC's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 43, is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE the brief plaintiff filed at docket number 41-1; 2. WPMC's motion to renew its reply in support of its motion t..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, it is ORDERED that, consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law:
1. Defendant Windsor Property Management Company's (WPMC's) motion to strike plaintiff Stepfanie McCaffrey's new brief in opposition to WPMC's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 43, is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE the brief plaintiff filed at docket number 41-1;
2. WPMC's motion to renew its reply in support of its motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 44, is GRANTED;
3. WPMC's renewed motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, Dkt. No. 36, is DENIED1;
4. WPMC's renewed motion to strike plaintiff's praecipe to issue a summons, Dkt. No. 37, is DENIED;
4. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to re-serve WPMC, Dkt. No. 40, is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall effectuate service on WPMC in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within fourteen days of the date of this Order.
FootNotes
1. In deciding WPMC's motion to dismiss, the Court considered plaintiff's previously filed opposition and brief in opposition, Dkt. Nos. 16 and 18, and WPMC's previously filed reply, Dkt. No. 20, which was re-filed at docket number 44-1.
Source: Leagle
