Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gilmore v. Commissioner of Social Security, 5:18-cv-00044-RBH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20190711d60 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. BRYAN HARWELL , Chief District Judge . On June 26, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 42 U.S.C. 2412, on the basis that the position taken by the defendant in this action was not substantially justified. On July 9, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for an EAJA award of $3,600.00 in attorney's fees and $16.00 in expenses. Based on the foregoing and after considering the briefs and materials submitted by the
More

ORDER

On June 26, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 42 U.S.C. § 2412, on the basis that the position taken by the defendant in this action was not substantially justified. On July 9, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for an EAJA award of $3,600.00 in attorney's fees and $16.00 in expenses.

Based on the foregoing and after considering the briefs and materials submitted by the parties, the court orders the defendant to pay the sum of $3,600.00 in attorney's fees and $16.00 in expenses, pursuant to EAJA, subject to the Treasury Offset Program if the prevailing party owes a debt to the federal government. However, the payment shall be made payable to the claimant pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and mailed to his attorney, with a copy to the claimant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer