Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HENDERSON v. EDENS CORP., 09-1308. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20141229388 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, District Judge. AND NOW, this 11 th day of December, 2014, after consideration of defendant Edens Corporation's ("Edens") Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF 17) and various motions filed by plaintiff Dennis Henderson ("Henderson") (ECF 11, 12, 21, and 23), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Henderson's August 14, 2014 motions for default judgment (ECF 11 and 12) are DENIED ; 2. Henderson's October 1, 2014 motion (ECF 21) is DENIED without prejudice; 3. He
More

ORDER

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2014, after consideration of defendant Edens Corporation's ("Edens") Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF 17) and various motions filed by plaintiff Dennis Henderson ("Henderson") (ECF 11, 12, 21, and 23), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Henderson's August 14, 2014 motions for default judgment (ECF 11 and 12) are DENIED; 2. Henderson's October 1, 2014 motion (ECF 21) is DENIED without prejudice; 3. Henderson's November 12, 2014 motion (ECF 23) to take this case out of suspense is DENIED at this time; 4. Edens' Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF 17) is GRANTED; and 5. Henderson is ORDERED to file, within sixty (60) days of the issuance of this Order, an amended complaint that sets forth (1) any and all factual allegations that give rise to his claims against Edens and (2) the legal rights that Henderson believes Edens violated that form the basis for his lawsuit.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer