BOWEN v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, 2:14-cv-365. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20151029a90
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST , District Judge . The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled (ECF No. 21), it is ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown not later than November 23, 2015, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement up
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST , District Judge . The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled (ECF No. 21), it is ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown not later than November 23, 2015, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement upo..
More
ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled (ECF No. 21), it is ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown not later than November 23, 2015, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement upon approval of the Court.
This Court explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached by the parties.
Each party shall bear its own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
