Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ULLMAN v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 13-5505. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140418i70 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. S NCHEZ, District Judge. AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2014, after careful and independent consideration of the motion of Defendants Williamson Friedberg & Jones and Joseph H. Jones for attorneys' fees, Plaintiff M. Robert Ullman's numerous responses thereto, and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, to which no objections have been filed, 1 it is ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. Defendants' Motion for Att
More

ORDER

JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2014, after careful and independent consideration of the motion of Defendants Williamson Friedberg & Jones and Joseph H. Jones for attorneys' fees, Plaintiff M. Robert Ullman's numerous responses thereto, and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, to which no objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Document 26) is GRANTED. Defendants are awarded $23,885.20 in attorneys' fees.

FootNotes


1. The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on March 27, 2014, together with a notice advising the parties of their obligation to file any objections within fourteen (14) days after service of the notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1. As of today's date, no objections have been filed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer