PIESTER v. HICKEY, 11-cv-04720. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120321c24
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge. AND NOW, this 20TH day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendants John M. Hickey and Potamkin Hyundai, Inc. to Dismiss Punitive Damages Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 16) and Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim (Docs. Nos. 20-21), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum.
ORDER
LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 20TH day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendants John M. Hickey and Potamkin Hyundai, Inc. to Dismiss Punitive Damages Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 16) and Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim (Docs. Nos. 20-21), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum.
Source: Leagle
