FOSTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 12-5851. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141009g97
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge. AND NOW , this 8 th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of the Amended Complaint in Foster (Doc. No. 6); the City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 84); Century Motors' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 85, 86); Jefferson's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 87); Foster's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 100); Century Motors' Reply (Doc. No. 102); City Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 103); Jefferson's Reply (Doc. No. 112); and
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge. AND NOW , this 8 th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of the Amended Complaint in Foster (Doc. No. 6); the City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 84); Century Motors' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 85, 86); Jefferson's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 87); Foster's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 100); Century Motors' Reply (Doc. No. 102); City Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 103); Jefferson's Reply (Doc. No. 112); and a..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of the Amended Complaint in Foster (Doc. No. 6); the City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 84); Century Motors' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 85, 86); Jefferson's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 87); Foster's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 100); Century Motors' Reply (Doc. No. 102); City Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 103); Jefferson's Reply (Doc. No. 112); and all attached exhibits and related filings; and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 84) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted in its entirety and the City is dismissed as a defendant in this case. Officer Boyle's Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted on Count Two only.
2. Century Motors' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 85, 86) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Century Motors' Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted on Count Two only.
3. Alfred Jefferson's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 87) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
