Emiabata v. Progressive Insurance, 1:17ev1859. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180924615
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS M. PARKER , Magistrate Judge . On August 20, 2018, Plaintiff Philip Emiabata filed a motion requesting that the court reconsider its August 8, 2018 order dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction. ECF Doc. No. 41. Emiabata has not submitted any new information suggesting that the court did, in fact, have subject matter jurisdiction over this case. As indicated in the court's August 8th order (ECF Doc. No. 39), Emiabata failed to show that diversity
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS M. PARKER , Magistrate Judge . On August 20, 2018, Plaintiff Philip Emiabata filed a motion requesting that the court reconsider its August 8, 2018 order dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction. ECF Doc. No. 41. Emiabata has not submitted any new information suggesting that the court did, in fact, have subject matter jurisdiction over this case. As indicated in the court's August 8th order (ECF Doc. No. 39), Emiabata failed to show that diversity ..
More
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS M. PARKER, Magistrate Judge.
On August 20, 2018, Plaintiff Philip Emiabata filed a motion requesting that the court reconsider its August 8, 2018 order dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction. ECF Doc. No. 41. Emiabata has not submitted any new information suggesting that the court did, in fact, have subject matter jurisdiction over this case. As indicated in the court's August 8th order (ECF Doc. No. 39), Emiabata failed to show that diversity existed between himself and Progressive at the time he filed his complaint. Emiabata may be able to join Progressive as a party to the lawsuit he filed in Kentucky, but this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
Because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, Emiabata's motion to reconsider is DENTED and the court's order dismissing this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is confirmed
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
