RUFF v. LONG, 14-4940. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150602e86
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 1 st day of June 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 41), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 50), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 51), and following oral argument and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 41) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter o
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 1 st day of June 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 41), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 50), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 51), and following oral argument and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 41) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 1st day of June 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 41), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 50), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 51), and following oral argument and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 41) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs First Amendment claims for retaliation, Fourteenth Amendment claims for violation of his procedural due process rights, and, on the remaining Fourth Amendment claim against the City of Philadelphia.
The City of Philadelphia is DISMISSED. As such, the Clerk of Court shall AMEND this caption to read as above, Ruff v. Long, et al.
Source: Leagle
