Hicks v. Wetzel, 1:17-CV-1969. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190315g15
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum of this date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion to stay these federal proceedings (Doc. 28) is DENIED. This case is dismissed without prejudice to allow petitioner to exhaust federal claims for relief in state court. 2. The motion to seal (Doc. 30) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall return the documents pending sealing decisi
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum of this date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion to stay these federal proceedings (Doc. 28) is DENIED. This case is dismissed without prejudice to allow petitioner to exhaust federal claims for relief in state court. 2. The motion to seal (Doc. 30) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall return the documents pending sealing decisio..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum of this date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The motion to stay these federal proceedings (Doc. 28) is DENIED. This case is dismissed without prejudice to allow petitioner to exhaust federal claims for relief in state court.
2. The motion to seal (Doc. 30) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall return the documents pending sealing decision (Docs. 31-36) to the custody of petitioner's counsel.
3. The motion for an order directing the Department of Corrections to allow counsel to provide petitioner with confidential legal documents in a manner that does not violate attorney/client privilege (Doc. 32) is DENIED.
4. The motion to stay the motion for an order directing the Department of Corrections to allow counsel to provide petitioner with confidential legal documents in a manner that does not violate attorney/client privilege (Doc. 37) is DENIED.
5. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
6. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
Source: Leagle
