SANDERS v. COLVIN, CIV-13-642-D. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20140808722
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for review of the Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(B). The parties fully briefed their respective positions and, on July 8, 2
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for review of the Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(B). The parties fully briefed their respective positions and, on July 8, 20..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for review of the Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636 (b)(1)(B). The parties fully briefed their respective positions and, on July 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15] in which he recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner.
In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties of the right to file objections to the same and directed the parties to file any objections no later than July 22, 2014. The Magistrate Judge further admonished the parties that failure to timely object would constitute a waiver of the right to appeal. The deadline for filing objections has expired and to date, neither party has filed objections or sought an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15] is adopted as though fully set forth herein.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for benefits is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
