SIMMONS v. McFADDEN, 12-7322. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121127171
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darren Simmons appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Stokes, No. 5:11-cv-00175-RMG (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 2012). Simmons' motion for a transcript at Government expense is denied
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darren Simmons appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Stokes, No. 5:11-cv-00175-RMG (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 2012). Simmons' motion for a transcript at Government expense is denied...
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darren Simmons appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Stokes, No. 5:11-cv-00175-RMG (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 2012). Simmons' motion for a transcript at Government expense is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
