BELL v. DISNER, 3:14CV91. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150305b08
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon its own motion. Pursuant to the Court's direction, the Defendants have submitted proposals from three potential defense experts. The Court has reviewed the proposals as well as the Receiver's comments submitted in letter form. It appears to the Court that scope of the work as proposed by Berkeley Research Group ("BRG") is the most appropriate. Accordingly, Defendants should obtain a rough estimate of the fees and
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon its own motion. Pursuant to the Court's direction, the Defendants have submitted proposals from three potential defense experts. The Court has reviewed the proposals as well as the Receiver's comments submitted in letter form. It appears to the Court that scope of the work as proposed by Berkeley Research Group ("BRG") is the most appropriate. Accordingly, Defendants should obtain a rough estimate of the fees and ..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon its own motion. Pursuant to the Court's direction, the Defendants have submitted proposals from three potential defense experts. The Court has reviewed the proposals as well as the Receiver's comments submitted in letter form. It appears to the Court that scope of the work as proposed by Berkeley Research Group ("BRG") is the most appropriate. Accordingly, Defendants should obtain a rough estimate of the fees and costs from each proposed expert using the scope of work as outlined in BRG's proposal. Once obtained, Defendants should submit the new proposals to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
