WOMACK v. JONES, CIV 12-399-FHS-KEW. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20130617843
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 14, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2013
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge. On this date the court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus for his failure to exhaust state court remedies. After a careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable wheth
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge. On this date the court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus for his failure to exhaust state court remedies. After a careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whethe..
More
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge.
On this date the court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus for his failure to exhaust state court remedies. After a careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). See also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
ACCORDINGLY, petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
