Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jack Howard v. Associated Transport, Inc., Talant Transfer Company v. Interstate Motor Freight System, 14835_1 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 14835_1 Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 06, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 337 F.2d 623 Jack HOWARD, v. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant. TALANT TRANSFER COMPANY v. INTERSTATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM. No. 14835. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Oct. 22, 1964. Decided Nov. 6, 1964. William C. Walker, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa. (H. A. Robinson, Bernard J. McAuley, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief) for appellant. Frank J. Kernan, Pittsburgh, Pa., (P. J. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the bri
More

337 F.2d 623

Jack HOWARD,
v.
ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant.
TALANT TRANSFER COMPANY
v.
INTERSTATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM.

No. 14835.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 22, 1964.
Decided Nov. 6, 1964.

William C. Walker, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa. (H. A. Robinson, Bernard J. McAuley, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief) for appellant.

Frank J. Kernan, Pittsburgh, Pa., (P. J. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Jack Howard.

V. C. Short, Kirkpatrick, Pomeroy, Lockhart & Johnson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Talant Transfer Co.

Joseph S. D. Christof, McCloskey, Best & Leslie, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Joseph R. Doherty, McCloskey, Best & Leslie, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Interstate Motor Freight System.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We find no prejudicial error arising out of the trial of this suit in the district court. The judgment of that court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer