Filed: Jun. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 26), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 25), and all documents filed in connection therewith, and after hearing argument on the Motions on April 29, 2013, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge. AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 26), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 25), and all documents filed in connection therewith, and after hearing argument on the Motions on April 29, 2013, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion ..
More
ORDER
JOHN R. PADOVA, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 26), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 25), and all documents filed in connection therewith, and after hearing argument on the Motions on April 29, 2013, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as we hold that the Watco Teak Oil Finish is a misbranded hazardous substance due to the label's failure to reference linseed oil as a hazardous component. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.
2. Defendants' Motion is DENIED in its entirety.
