Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROGERS v. GENTEX CORPORATION, 3:16-CV-00137. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20170310736 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 6th Day OF MARCH 2017 , upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 34), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 34), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count I is DENIED. 3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count 1\ is DENIED. 4. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count III is GRANTED. Count III is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 5. Defendant's Motion to Dism
More

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 6th Day OF MARCH 2017, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 34), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 34), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count I is DENIED. 3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count 1\ is DENIED. 4. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count III is GRANTED. Count III is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 5. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count IV is DENIED. 6. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Vis GRANTED. Count Vis DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 7. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count VI is GRANTED. Count VI is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 8. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count VII is GRANTED. Count VII is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 9. Plaintiffs may file aSecond Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer