Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pendergraft v. Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges, CIV-18-793-D. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20181102k82 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI , District Judge . Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on September 18, 2018. [Doc. No. 10] and [Doc. No. 12]. During the pendency of the motions, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 17] as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). This Amended Complaint supersedes Plaintiff's original pleading and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515 , 1517 (10 th Cir. 1991); Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo
More

ORDER

Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on September 18, 2018. [Doc. No. 10] and [Doc. No. 12]. During the pendency of the motions, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 17] as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). This Amended Complaint supersedes Plaintiff's original pleading and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-1181 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). Thus, Defendants' motions directed at the Complaint are moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants David Misak and Todd Thurman's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] and Defendant Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 12] are DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO OREDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer