Filed: Apr. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: HLD-008 (Revised) NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 13-4751 _ IN RE: JOE M. TONEY, JR., Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 11-cv-00780) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 6, 2014 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: April 4, 2014) _ OPINION _ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner, Joe
Summary: HLD-008 (Revised) NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 13-4751 _ IN RE: JOE M. TONEY, JR., Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 11-cv-00780) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 6, 2014 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: April 4, 2014) _ OPINION _ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner, Joe ..
More
HLD-008 (Revised) NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 13-4751
___________
IN RE: JOE M. TONEY, JR.,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 11-cv-00780)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
March 6, 2014
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: April 4, 2014)
_________
OPINION
_________
PER CURIAM
Pro se petitioner, Joe Toney, has filed a mandamus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1651, wherein he seeks to compel the United States District Court for the Middle
District of Pennsylvania to rule on motions for summary action filed by the parties to the
underlying civil action. Finding no basis for granting mandamus relief, we will deny the
petition.
From a review of the District Court docket, an order disposing of the parties’
summary judgment motions, as well as Toney’s motion for default judgment, was entered
on March 18, 2014. Accordingly, Toney’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking to
compel the District Court to dispose of the motions is moot. The petition for a writ of
mandamus is thus denied.
2