Morgan v. ForestView Opco, LLC, 3:19-cv-104. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20191204c18
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2019
Summary: FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT SHARON L. OVINGTON , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon the Parties' proposed settlement agreement. (Doc. #16). Upon receiving notification of an agreement, this Court held a hearing at which the Parties indicated that they reached a settlement agreement and are satisfied with the agreement. No one appeared in court to contest the terms of the settlement. Accordingly, this Court hereby ADOPTS the Parties' proposed settlement agreement (Doc.
Summary: FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT SHARON L. OVINGTON , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon the Parties' proposed settlement agreement. (Doc. #16). Upon receiving notification of an agreement, this Court held a hearing at which the Parties indicated that they reached a settlement agreement and are satisfied with the agreement. No one appeared in court to contest the terms of the settlement. Accordingly, this Court hereby ADOPTS the Parties' proposed settlement agreement (Doc. #..
More
FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT
SHARON L. OVINGTON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Parties' proposed settlement agreement. (Doc. #16). Upon receiving notification of an agreement, this Court held a hearing at which the Parties indicated that they reached a settlement agreement and are satisfied with the agreement. No one appeared in court to contest the terms of the settlement.
Accordingly, this Court hereby ADOPTS the Parties' proposed settlement agreement (Doc. #16) and DISMISSES this action with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
