Filed: Sep. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. Nos. 11 and 12), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto, and Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, Defendant HRA USA Ltd is DISMISSED from this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and Counts I, II, V and VI are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. Nos. 11 and 12), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto, and Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, Defendant HRA USA Ltd is DISMISSED from this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and Counts I, II, V and VI are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P...
More
ORDER
J. CURTIS JOYNER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. Nos. 11 and 12), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto, and Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, Defendant HRA USA Ltd is DISMISSED from this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and Counts I, II, V and VI are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects, the Motion is DENIED.
