Marcial v. City of New York, 1:19-cv-04928. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200312d28
Visitors: 47
Filed: Mar. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL MARY KAY VYSKOCIL , District Judge . It having been reported to this Court by Magistrate Judge Cott that this case has been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by April 10, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muz
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL MARY KAY VYSKOCIL , District Judge . It having been reported to this Court by Magistrate Judge Cott that this case has been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by April 10, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, District Judge.
It having been reported to this Court by Magistrate Judge Cott that this case has been settled, it is hereby
ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by April 10, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
