Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 13-3922 _ ARLINGTON G. GHEE; LAYVONE GHEE, his wife v. MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD; RANDY J. BEE, JOHN DOE 1-10, ABC, INC., 1-10 Marten Transport, LTD; Randy J. Bee, Appellants _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil No. 3-11-cv-03718) District Judge: Hon. Freda L. Wolfson _ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 10, 2014 BEFORE: FISHER, COWEN AND TASHIMA*, Cir
Summary: NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 13-3922 _ ARLINGTON G. GHEE; LAYVONE GHEE, his wife v. MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD; RANDY J. BEE, JOHN DOE 1-10, ABC, INC., 1-10 Marten Transport, LTD; Randy J. Bee, Appellants _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil No. 3-11-cv-03718) District Judge: Hon. Freda L. Wolfson _ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 10, 2014 BEFORE: FISHER, COWEN AND TASHIMA*, Circ..
More
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 13-3922 _______________ ARLINGTON G. GHEE; LAYVONE GHEE, his wife v. MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD; RANDY J. BEE, JOHN DOE 1-10, ABC, INC., 1-10 Marten Transport, LTD; Randy J. Bee, Appellants ______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil No. 3-11-cv-03718) District Judge: Hon. Freda L. Wolfson _______________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 10, 2014 BEFORE: FISHER, COWEN AND TASHIMA*, Circuit Judges _______________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION _______________ _______________ *Hon. A. Wallace Tashima, Senior United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. At the direction of the Court, it is O R D E R E D that the Opinion entered June 25, 2014 is amended to remove a repeated line on page 2, note 2 which reads “2 Ghee’s wife raised a derivative claim for loss of consortium. But it appears that.” For the Court, s/ Marcia A. Waldron Clerk Dated: June 26, 2014 2
