Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Light v. Berryhill, 3:17-CV-1293. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181114995 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 2 nd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick's Report & Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 15) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED for the reasons discussed therein. 2. Plaintiff's Appeal is DENIED. In so ruling, the Court wishes to note that it would have rejected the R&R in this case, as well as the Decision of the ALJ and would have o
More

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick's Report & Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 15) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED for the reasons discussed therein. 2. Plaintiff's Appeal is DENIED. In so ruling, the Court wishes to note that it would have rejected the R&R in this case, as well as the Decision of the ALJ and would have ordered the grant of benefits to the plaintiff if there were any indication in the record of a reoccurrence of the claimant's breast cancer, her ovarian cancer, or any evidence whatsoever of metastasis to any other organ or part of her body. Nothing in the issues raised by the plaintiff in her "Brief" and accompanying exhibits (Doc. 9) suggest that any of these changes have occurred. 3. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision is AFFIRMED. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer