HINES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 3:11-cv-409. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120323i11
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #24), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's mot
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #24), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's moti..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #24), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and an Order clarifying that Plaintiff's appeal of the judgement entered in this case would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
