BELL v. MILLER, 5:15 CV 127. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150709e30
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2015
Summary: REPORT ORDER ADOPTING AND RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY , District Judge . This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed June 4, 2015 (Doc. 12). The R&R recommends this Court deny Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) without prejudice to any final adjudication of his underlying claims for habeas relief. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations
Summary: REPORT ORDER ADOPTING AND RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY , District Judge . This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed June 4, 2015 (Doc. 12). The R&R recommends this Court deny Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) without prejudice to any final adjudication of his underlying claims for habeas relief. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations w..
More
REPORT ORDER ADOPTING AND RECOMMENDATION
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed June 4, 2015 (Doc. 12). The R&R recommends this Court deny Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) without prejudice to any final adjudication of his underlying claims for habeas relief.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Petitioner's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied without prejudice to any final adjudication of his underlying claims for habeas relief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
