Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: MORANDUM ORDER DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 26 th day of June, —, after Plaintiff CBS Corporation filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations, ECF No. 35, and a Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Contract, ECF No. 40, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until June 6, 2014, to fi
Summary: MORANDUM ORDER DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 26 th day of June, —, after Plaintiff CBS Corporation filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations, ECF No. 35, and a Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Contract, ECF No. 40, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until June 6, 2014, to fil..
More
MORANDUM ORDER
DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 26th day of June, —, after Plaintiff CBS Corporation filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations, ECF No. 35, and a Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Contract, ECF No. 40, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until June 6, 2014, to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by Plaintiff, ECF No. 69, and Defendant's response to Plaintiffs objections ("Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations"), ECF No. 70, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Schindler Elevator Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations is GRANTED, and Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Contract is dismissed as moot. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) ofthe Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.