U.S. v. McLEAN, 3:14-CR-163-RJC-DCK. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151013c72
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Forensic Evaluation of the Defendant (Document No. 23) filed with the Court on September 24, 2015. Without prejudice to the opportunity to make a longer filing later if needed, the Court directs that counsel for the parties file status reports of three (3) pages or less by October 16, 2015 . These status reports should set forth what the parties believe is the appropriate procedure going forward in light o
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Forensic Evaluation of the Defendant (Document No. 23) filed with the Court on September 24, 2015. Without prejudice to the opportunity to make a longer filing later if needed, the Court directs that counsel for the parties file status reports of three (3) pages or less by October 16, 2015 . These status reports should set forth what the parties believe is the appropriate procedure going forward in light of..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Forensic Evaluation of the Defendant (Document No. 23) filed with the Court on September 24, 2015. Without prejudice to the opportunity to make a longer filing later if needed, the Court directs that counsel for the parties file status reports of three (3) pages or less by October 16, 2015. These status reports should set forth what the parties believe is the appropriate procedure going forward in light of the findings of the Forensic Evaluation and the requirements of relevant case law, including Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003) and United States v. Evans, 404 F.3d 227 (4th Cir. 2005).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
