Lamar Brown v., 14-3283 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 14-3283
Visitors: 25
Filed: Oct. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: CLD-375 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 14-3283 _ IN RE: LAMAR BROWN, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Related to Civ. No. 3-12-cv-02021) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. September 25, 2014 Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: October 3, 2014) _ OPINION _ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner Lamar Brown has filed a petiti
Summary: CLD-375 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 14-3283 _ IN RE: LAMAR BROWN, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Related to Civ. No. 3-12-cv-02021) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. September 25, 2014 Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: October 3, 2014) _ OPINION _ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner Lamar Brown has filed a petitio..
More
CLD-375 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 14-3283
___________
IN RE: LAMAR BROWN,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to Civ. No. 3-12-cv-02021)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
September 25, 2014
Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: October 3, 2014)
_________
OPINION
_________
PER CURIAM
Pro se petitioner Lamar Brown has filed a petition for writ of mandamus pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1651. He seeks an order compelling the District Court to act on his 28
U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Specifically, he asks that we compel
the District Court to remand his criminal case to the state trial court with instructions to
change his sentence. Our review of the District Court’s docket reveals that Brown’s
action was resolved by the District Court shortly after he filed this petition, and that
Brown has filed an appeal of that order, which is currently pending. See M.D. Pa. Civ.
A. No. 12-cv-02021. Brown’s mandamus petition is therefore moot, and we will deny it
accordingly.
2
Source: CourtListener