Baker v. Walsh, 14-cv-01879. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160317e08
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES KNOLL GARDNER , District Judge . NOW, this 15th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed March 28, 2014 ("Habeas Corpus Petition") (Document 1); (2) Respondents' untitled response filed June 9, 2014 ("Response") (Document 5); (3) Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski dated and filed February 18, 2016 (Document 16);
Summary: ORDER JAMES KNOLL GARDNER , District Judge . NOW, this 15th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed March 28, 2014 ("Habeas Corpus Petition") (Document 1); (2) Respondents' untitled response filed June 9, 2014 ("Response") (Document 5); (3) Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski dated and filed February 18, 2016 (Document 16); ..
More
ORDER
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge.
NOW, this 15th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the following documents:
(1) Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed March 28, 2014 ("Habeas Corpus Petition") (Document 1);
(2) Respondents' untitled response filed June 9, 2014 ("Response") (Document 5);
(3) Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski dated and filed February 18, 2016 (Document 16);
it appearing that no objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sitarski;1 it further appearing that Magistrate Judge Sitarski's Report and Recommendation correctly determined the legal and factual issues presented in the Habeas Corpus Petition,
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Sitarski's Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Habeas Corpus Petition is denied with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied.
FootNotes
1. Petitioner received a Notice accompanying the Report and Recommendation stating that he was required to file any objections to it within fourteen days pursuant to Rule 72.1(IV)(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Notice and Report and Recommendation were served on the parties on February 19, 2016. Thus, any objections were required to be filed on or before March 4, 2016. No objections have been filed as of the date of this Order.
Source: Leagle
