Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MASON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 13-5163. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140912b85 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge. AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants, Third Corsa, Inc., Elaine Luckin, and Lenny Luckin's, pro se Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of Florence Elizabeth Mason, in her own right and on behalf of, Vincent T. Mason, Jr., and Crystal Mason (Doc. No. 49), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED. 1 It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, the Philadelphia Animal Control Unit, and its Officers John a
More

ORDER

ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants, Third Corsa, Inc., Elaine Luckin, and Lenny Luckin's, pro se Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of Florence Elizabeth Mason, in her own right and on behalf of, Vincent T. Mason, Jr., and Crystal Mason (Doc. No. 49), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED.1

It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, the Philadelphia Animal Control Unit, and its Officers John and Jane Doe are DISMISSED as Plaintiffs in this action.

FootNotes


1. As noted in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendant, Elaine Luckin, as a pro se litigant, cannot represent Defendant, Lenny Luckin, in this action. See Osei-Afriyie ex rel. Osei-Afriyie v. Med. Coll. of Pa., 937 F.2d 876, 882-83 (3d Cir. 1991). We, however, dismiss sua sponte all claims against Defendant, Lenny Luckin pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim against him for which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer