FAUCHER v. LEIGHTON FORD, INC., 3:15-cv-01630. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20161007c89
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) filed by the defendant Lehighton Water Authority, and pursuant to the Memorandum filed this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is DENIED. 2. The defendant Lehighton Water Authority shall file an answer to the amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
ORDER
JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) filed by the defendant Lehighton Water Authority, and pursuant to the Memorandum filed this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is DENIED.
2. The defendant Lehighton Water Authority shall file an answer to the amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
Source: Leagle
