Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., 16101 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 16101 Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 04, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 374 F.2d 892 William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company, Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO. William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company v. FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO., Appellant. Nos. 16100, 16101. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued March 21, 1967. Decided April 4, 1967. See also D.C., 255 F. Supp. 905 . Edwin J. McDermott, Philadelphia, Pa. and Bernard I. Shovlin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Smith. Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa.,
More

374 F.2d 892

William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company, Appellant,
v.
FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO.
William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company
v.
FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO., Appellant.

Nos. 16100, 16101.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 21, 1967.
Decided April 4, 1967.

See also D.C., 255 F. Supp. 905.

Edwin J. McDermott, Philadelphia, Pa. and Bernard I. Shovlin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Smith.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Warrin C. Meyers, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

On review of the record of these appeals at 16100 and 16101, we find no prejudicial error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed, each party to bear its own costs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer