SCHLEGEL v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 3:11-CV-2190. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120213804
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW, this 10 th day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED. Attorney fees will be stricken from Count I, and paragraphs 25 and 28 will be stricken from Count II as impermissible claims under Pennsylvania's Unfair Insurance Practice Act, 40 Pa. C.S.A. 1171.1 et seq. Counts II and III will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (2) Plaintiffs are given twenty-one (21) days from t
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW, this 10 th day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED. Attorney fees will be stricken from Count I, and paragraphs 25 and 28 will be stricken from Count II as impermissible claims under Pennsylvania's Unfair Insurance Practice Act, 40 Pa. C.S.A. 1171.1 et seq. Counts II and III will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (2) Plaintiffs are given twenty-one (21) days from th..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW, this 10th day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED. Attorney fees will be stricken from Count I, and paragraphs 25 and 28 will be stricken from Count II as impermissible claims under Pennsylvania's Unfair Insurance Practice Act, 40 Pa. C.S.A. § 1171.1 et seq. Counts II and III will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
(2) Plaintiffs are given twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to submit an amended complaint as to Counts II and III.
(3) Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 6) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
