U.S. v. DAWKINS, 15-99. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150818b41
Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAURICE B. COHILL, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, to-wit, this 17 th day of August , 2015, upon consideration of the attached Motion, it is hereby ordered and decreed that said Motion by GRANTED. Pursuant to this Order, the United States Probation Office is directed to prepare a partial presentence investigation report regarding Bradley Dawkins. The report need only calculate and address issues concerning the U.S.S.G. criminal history level that would apply to Mr. Dawkins shoul
Summary: ORDER MAURICE B. COHILL, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, to-wit, this 17 th day of August , 2015, upon consideration of the attached Motion, it is hereby ordered and decreed that said Motion by GRANTED. Pursuant to this Order, the United States Probation Office is directed to prepare a partial presentence investigation report regarding Bradley Dawkins. The report need only calculate and address issues concerning the U.S.S.G. criminal history level that would apply to Mr. Dawkins should..
More
ORDER
MAURICE B. COHILL, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, to-wit, this 17th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the attached Motion, it is hereby ordered and decreed that said Motion by GRANTED. Pursuant to this Order, the United States Probation Office is directed to prepare a partial presentence investigation report regarding Bradley Dawkins. The report need only calculate and address issues concerning the U.S.S.G. criminal history level that would apply to Mr. Dawkins should he be sentenced in connection with the current federal charges against him, including the arguable applicability of any § 851, career offender and/or other enhancements should the court impose a sentence in this case. The presentence investigation report shall be served on counsel for Mr. Dawkins and counsel for the government on October 19, 2015
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any extension of time necessitated by the grant of Defendant's Motion for an early partial presentence investigation report be deemed excludable delay under the Speedy Trial Act 18 U.S.C. §3161 et seq. Specifically, the court finds that the ends of justice served by granting Defendant's Motion and that any continuance resulting from it outweighs the interest of the public and the Defendant to a speedy trial.
Source: Leagle
