Pinckney v. Berryhill, 0:18-557-RMG. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20181030d52
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the Defendant to remand this matter to the agency for the purpose of awarding Plaintiff Social Security benefits from the onset date of her disability, October 19, 2012. (Dkt. No. 20). The Court is informed that counsel for Plaintiff has consented to his motion. ( Id. ). Therefore, the Court reverses the prior decision of the Commissioner and remands this matter to the agency pursuant to Sentenc
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the Defendant to remand this matter to the agency for the purpose of awarding Plaintiff Social Security benefits from the onset date of her disability, October 19, 2012. (Dkt. No. 20). The Court is informed that counsel for Plaintiff has consented to his motion. ( Id. ). Therefore, the Court reverses the prior decision of the Commissioner and remands this matter to the agency pursuant to Sentence..
More
ORDER
RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the Defendant to remand this matter to the agency for the purpose of awarding Plaintiff Social Security benefits from the onset date of her disability, October 19, 2012. (Dkt. No. 20). The Court is informed that counsel for Plaintiff has consented to his motion. (Id.). Therefore, the Court reverses the prior decision of the Commissioner and remands this matter to the agency pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to award benefits. The Court directs the Clerk to enter a final judgment in this matter.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
