CLINTON v. ASTRUE, 11-0613. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120329896
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 26 th day of march, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Dkt. No. 10) filed December 15, 2011; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 12) filed January 17, 2012; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. the Report and Recommendation is APPRO
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 26 th day of march, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Dkt. No. 10) filed December 15, 2011; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 12) filed January 17, 2012; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROV..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 26th day of march, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Dkt. No. 10) filed December 15, 2011; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 12) filed January 17, 2012; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the Plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED in part;
3. the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
Source: Leagle
