Guity v. Santos, 18 CIVIL 10387 (PKC). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191206f39
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT P. KEVIN CASTEL , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 5, 2019, the motions of Santos and Sony to dismiss the complaint are GRANTED. Plaintiff having failed to either (a) serve Alcover and We Loud within the time provided in Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., or (b) seek an exclusion of time to do so. Alcover and We Loud are dismissed without prejudice and judgment is entered for the def
Summary: JUDGMENT P. KEVIN CASTEL , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 5, 2019, the motions of Santos and Sony to dismiss the complaint are GRANTED. Plaintiff having failed to either (a) serve Alcover and We Loud within the time provided in Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., or (b) seek an exclusion of time to do so. Alcover and We Loud are dismissed without prejudice and judgment is entered for the defe..
More
JUDGMENT
P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 5, 2019, the motions of Santos and Sony to dismiss the complaint are GRANTED. Plaintiff having failed to either (a) serve Alcover and We Loud within the time provided in Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., or (b) seek an exclusion of time to do so. Alcover and We Loud are dismissed without prejudice and judgment is entered for the defendants; accordingly, the case is closed.
Source: Leagle
