DAWSON v. BUSH, 4:13-2236-DCN-TER. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20140429e95
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS E. ROGERS, III, Magistrate Judge. Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel filed March 5, 2014. (Doc. #52). Defendants filed a response in opposition to the motion. (Doc. #55). In his Motion to Compel, Plaintiff asserts that he served Request for Production of Documents on January 17, 2014, but the Defendants have not provided him with the requested information. Defendants filed a response to the motion indicating that they mailed their responses to the Request
Summary: ORDER THOMAS E. ROGERS, III, Magistrate Judge. Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel filed March 5, 2014. (Doc. #52). Defendants filed a response in opposition to the motion. (Doc. #55). In his Motion to Compel, Plaintiff asserts that he served Request for Production of Documents on January 17, 2014, but the Defendants have not provided him with the requested information. Defendants filed a response to the motion indicating that they mailed their responses to the Request f..
More
ORDER
THOMAS E. ROGERS, III, Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel filed March 5, 2014. (Doc. #52). Defendants filed a response in opposition to the motion. (Doc. #55).
In his Motion to Compel, Plaintiff asserts that he served Request for Production of Documents on January 17, 2014, but the Defendants have not provided him with the requested information. Defendants filed a response to the motion indicating that they mailed their responses to the Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff on March 3, 2014. Defendants attached a copy of Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents along with their responses. Therefore, it appears that Defendants' responses and Plaintiff's motion crossed in the mail. As it appears the Defendants have responded to Plaintiff's discovery request, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (doc. #52) is moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
