Filed: Apr. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 11-3996 _ MICHAEL E. SILUK, JR., Appellant v. CATHERINE MERWIN, Director of Perry County Domestic Relations Section _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Civil Action No. 1-11-cv-01654) District Judge: Honorable Judge Christopher C. Conner _ Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge and CHAGARES, GARTH, Circuit Judges _ ORDER AMENDING OPINION _ At the direction of the Court, the opinion fil
Summary: PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 11-3996 _ MICHAEL E. SILUK, JR., Appellant v. CATHERINE MERWIN, Director of Perry County Domestic Relations Section _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Civil Action No. 1-11-cv-01654) District Judge: Honorable Judge Christopher C. Conner _ Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge and CHAGARES, GARTH, Circuit Judges _ ORDER AMENDING OPINION _ At the direction of the Court, the opinion file..
More
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 11-3996 _______________ MICHAEL E. SILUK, JR., Appellant v. CATHERINE MERWIN, Director of Perry County Domestic Relations Section ________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Civil Action No. 1-11-cv-01654) District Judge: Honorable Judge Christopher C. Conner ________________ Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge and CHAGARES, GARTH, Circuit Judges ________________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION ________________ At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed April 10, 2015 is hereby amended to reflect the appeal fee applicable at the time Appellant filed his notice of appeal. Page 3, paragraph 2: He currently owes a filing fee to both courts ($350 to the Clerk of the District Court and $455 to the Clerk of this Court which was the applicable appeal fee at the time the notice of appeal was filed). and Page 9, paragraph 1: In this case, Siluk faces the prospect of paying two fees: (1) the $350 district court filing fee that he incurred by filing his pro se complaint; and (2) the $455 fee he incurred in this court for pursuing an appeal of the district court judgment. For the Court, Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date: April 28, 2015 2
